Using an urn consisting of paper not only hinders the full growth of the tree, it is also bad for nature, since paper contains chemicals such as polypropylene and polyethylene. Not to mention, cutting trees is necessary to manufacture these urns.  

In this article, we’re focusing on deforestation in the name of paper production. What is deforestation? What’s so bad about it? And what can we do to help?

This is the first in a series of blogs looking at the impact of the paper industry on our environment. We’ll be covering some of the big issues and questioning if, and how, we can rebalance our friendship with trees.

Paper. Even in this digital era, it’s rare that a day goes by without us interacting with a product made from wood pulp: a paper cup, till receipts, a cereal box, tickets, tissues, fancy shopping bags, sticky notes, newspapers, books, magazines…

14% of deforestation is done to satisfy our huge appetite for paper goods.

Some of these items are steadily becoming outdated in favour of digitalisation, at least in some parts of the world. As we move into the thick of the 21st century many of us have trained ourselves to stop before printing out emails (seriously people!). But it’s still hard to imagine our lives without certain paper products. And the truth is about 14% of deforestation is done to satisfy our huge appetite for paper goods. This amounts to the destruction of around 4.1 million hectares of forest each year in the name of our paper obsession – an area the size of the Netherlands every 365 days.

This amounts to the destruction of around 4.1 million hectares of forest each year in the name of our paper obsession.

At Paper on the Rocks we do not find this acceptable. Do you? Not sure? Read on to discover why we want to put an end to deforestation and create a healthy paper industry.

What is deforestation? And why do we do it?

Deforestation is the clearing of vast areas of trees, largely as a result of human activities. But why? Here are just a few of the excuses we use to destroy forests (and often, the plant and animal species that live among them):

• Clearing land for agriculture so we can plant Oil Palms (to produce palm oil), Soybeans (to produce food for ourselves, and to feed livestock with various soy products), and other crops
• Creating space for cattle ranches in response to the increasing global demand for beef
• Expanding urban areas, build new transport routes and housing developments
• And, of course, providing the paper industry with wood pulp to turn into paper and cardboard products, our focus today.

What’s so bad about deforestation and, in turn, the paper industry?

Our biodiversity depends on forests

The majority of the world’s biodiversity (the huge array of insects, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, plants and trees) lives in, and depends on, forests. This is where it’s evolved over hundreds of thousands of years. Deforestation can wipe out huge swathes of this incredible richness within a matter of moments. According to the WWF’s recent Living Planet report, the current levels of deforestation make the species living in our rainforests some of the most endangered in the world.

Deforestation can wipe out huge swathes of this incredible richness within a matter of moments.

Forests soak up carbon dioxide and feed us with oxygen

Trees keep us alive. They create the oxygen we breathe and remove and store harmful carbon dioxide, helping to reduce global warming. We are utterly dependable on them. It’s as simple as that.

Deforestation releases more carbon into the atmosphere

As mentioned above, trees store carbon dioxide, which is released when cutting them down, burning them or making them into pulp for paper production. And, as you might expect, this contributes to global warming. Scientists estimate that 23% of man-made carbon dioxide emissions are as a result of the loss of forests. This is far more than the amount created by all the cars and lorries on our roads, estimated at 14% by the World Car-free Network.

But replacing the richness of an older forest (…) with fast growing monocultures, fuelled by desire to make money, can have devastating effects.

Growing new forests isn’t the same as saving naturally established forests

Sure, offsetting the destruction of centuries old forests by growing new ones is better than doing nothing at all. In some cases. When we grow new forests thoughtfully, with biodiversity at the forefront, and when we then protect these trees from further deforestation.

But replacing the richness of an older forest’s biodiversity and high-quality soil with fast growing monocultures (lots of one type of tree all growing side by side), fuelled by desire to make money, can have devastating effects.

For example, the deadly forest fires Portugal has endured over the last few summers are largely caused by the planting and mismanagement of Eucalyptus trees. These trees are fast growing, great for cutting down to make wood pulp, but terrible for biodiversity because they make it very hard for other types of trees to grow alongside them, and even insects don’t like them. They’re also highly flammable due to their natural oils.

Sounds pretty bad, right?

References

[1] Industrial Environmental Performance Metrics, Challenges and Opportunities – The Pulp and Paper Industry (1999)

[2] The Guardian’s Ultimate Climate Change FAQ – How do trees and forests relate to climate change? (April 7, 2010)

[3] Ecowatch article: Norway becomes world’s first country to ban deforestation (June 8, 2016)